Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:01:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080117100051.4777de2a@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? by Thufir |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:19:48 +0000 (UTC), Thufir wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Let's turn this around: if Gentoo were to attract a larger user base I |
| 4 | > posit that this would attract more developers. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | How do you draw that conclusion? How would attracting users who are |
| 7 | unwilling to read documentation and get their hands dirty increase the |
| 8 | number of potential developers? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Neil Bothwick |
| 13 | |
| 14 | COMMAND: A suggestion made to a computer. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead? | Thufir <hawat.thufir@×××××.com> |