Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ???
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:01:34
Message-Id: 200702220950.22067.alan@linuxholdings.co.za
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ??? by "Hemmann
1 On Thursday 22 February 2007, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
2 > initrd/initramfs is mostly for distributions who want to compile
3 > everything as module, people with strange settings (like some kind of
4 > raid), or people too stupid to build their own kernel. If you build
5 > your kernel and build everything you need to boot into it, you can
6 > live without that crap.
7
8 In all fairness, an initramfs and a fully modular kernel is the only
9 realistic way to build a binary distro CDs for redistribution. Or the
10 Gentoo LiveCDs for that matter. We *could* use the slackware approach
11 and supply 10 basic kernels and ask you to choose the most appropriate
12 one, but that never really caught on :-)
13
14 But you are mostly right, around here in Gentoo-land it's become almost
15 a guerilla rite of passage to be able to drop genkernel and roll your
16 own (raid users excepted of course)
17
18 alan
19
20
21 --
22 Optimists say the glass is half full,
23 Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
24 Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?
25
26 Alan McKinnon
27 alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
28 +27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
29 --
30 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] ramfs - is it necessary ??? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>