Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:49:32
Message-Id: 1844154.0S5fDqyjGd@dell_xps
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo by "Max R.D. Parmer"
1 On Monday 28 Mar 2016 09:26:54 Max R.D. Parmer wrote:
2 > Ahh, OK. So secure communications between all these clients.
3 >
4 > The two big players for client-side encryption for email or messaging
5 > data would be GPG and OTR;
6
7 Also S/MIME encryption of the email message body using SSL certificates
8 achieves the same end result (i.e. encrypted payload) as GnuPG offers. For
9 GPG you may need a plugin (e.g. enigmail on T'bird) or something similar for
10 phone clients, but S/MIME is usually available by default for most email
11 clients and platforms.
12
13 A word of caution:
14
15 Snowden warned us that the end devices do not possess strong enough randomness
16 generators to ensure that the encryption they perform cannot be reverse
17 engineered.
18
19 A recent article shared on this M/L also showed that anything with Intel
20 inside® can be deemed as intentionally weakened to enable potential
21 interference with our privacy.
22
23 Therefore treat your encrypted communications and their content with caution,
24 because you don't know how private these may remain in the future.
25
26 --
27 Regards,
28 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>