Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!!
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:01:39
Message-Id: 6329308.7Z3be5xHzu@dell_xps
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] konqueror:5 - why couldn't it be more like konqueror:3 ?!! by R0b0t1
1 On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 14:22:06 R0b0t1 wrote:
2 > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > > OK, I know life moves on, but this move has been a retrograde step for me.
4 > > My konqueror:5 recently updated seems to have a number of problems and
5 > > <aheam!> features I am not happy with. Grateful for any pointers to
6 > > address these. In no particular order.
7 > >
8 > > 1. The Bookmarks Toolbar will *always* show up when launching Konqueror.
9 > > I
10 > > deselect Settings/Toolbars Shown/Bookmark Toolbar and relaunch the
11 > > application, only to find out my deselection will not stick.
12 > >
13 > > 2. The menu shows no icons, only text; buttons like open new tab/close
14 > > current tab show no icons, making difficult to guess.
15 > >
16 > > 3. When used as a file manager Konqueror will only open directories or
17 > > files if I double click on them. I have set up in systemsettings5
18 > > Hardware/Input Devices/Mouse/Single click to open files and folders.
19 > > Konqueror ignores it.
20 > >
21 > > 4. All my years of Bookmarks of Konqueror:4 gone. I had to import them
22 > > manually.
23 > >
24 > > 5. Network places, gone.
25 > >
26 > > 6. Left hand Panels with Places/Devices/Folders ain't thaa'r.
27 > >
28 > > 7. Konqueror Introduction page, no icons; unless I hover over them,
29 > > hyperlinked titles shown in dark grey over a blue background. I know my
30 > > eye sight is not as good as it used to be, but this is really akin to
31 > > usability sabotage.
32 > >
33 > > The are probably more problems I have not captured above, but my
34 > > experience of konqueror:5 is that of crippleware. I don't know if this
35 > > has anything to do with it, I am not running konqueror on a full plasma
36 > > desktop, but as a stand alone application. Have you observed similar?
37 > >
38 > > --
39 > > Regards,
40 > > Mick
41 >
42 > You should take your complaints to the project's bug tracker. I know
43 > they will take number 7 very seriously, and seeing as you've used the
44 > project for an appreciable amount of time they will likely consider
45 > most of your other issues.
46 >
47 > At the very least they would probably tell you how to do what you
48 > don't know how to do. If they can't insist that there has been a
49 > regression.
50
51 Thanks R0b0t1, I don't want to darken their doorstep of devs with issues which
52 appear isolated to my systems. Other M/L participants many of whom are
53 running the full Plasma desktop, do not seem to have such problems. So, I'm
54 guessing I must be missing some package or other to complement the required
55 functionality.
56
57 I'm still on kmail:4 and all menu icons are shown and functionality is not
58 crippled in any way. I fear what might happen when I eventually have to
59 install kmail:5.
60
61
62 > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
63 wrote:
64 > > Halfway through the KDE-4 lifecycle it became known that konqueror then
65 > > was essentially without a maintainer in the KDE project. Gut feels tells
66 > > me that has likely not changed and the minimum work was done to get it
67 > > to build under KDE-5. Just gut feel.
68 >
69 > That is a good guess, but there has also been a transition away from
70 > skeuomorphism (traditional desktop icons) to what Google calls
71 > Material Design (which as far as I can tell was actually created by
72 > various experimental Linux projects who had no artists as
73 > contributors, so they just started drawing colored squares). The new
74 > UI for Konquerer may be completely intentional.
75 >
76 > I'd consider this not a failing of material design, which can produce
77 > extremely attractive interfaces, but as a failing of the program; it
78 > does look like there were features removed. To be fair a lot of things
79 > that developers do (after seeing Google support it) such as
80 > discoverable interfaces and minimalist UIs are often done incorrectly
81 > as there tends to be a huge gulf between developers and their users.
82 >
83 > And to everyone: KDE-5 doesn't exist, what you are probably referring
84 > to is Plasma 5.
85
86 I don't recall calling it KDE-5, but if I did, Plasma 5 devs & users please
87 accept my apologies (old dog ... new tricks).
88 --
89 Regards,
90 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies