| 1 |
W dniu 04.02.2010 12:45, Willie Wong pisze: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:59:14AM -0800, Steven wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I tried all, and nothing seemed to solve the problem. |
| 4 |
>> I'm at a loss as to what this could be. |
| 5 |
>> When it says "requires -liberty" is liberty part of a package? I am not |
| 6 |
>> sure what it means by -liberty and were to acquire it. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The library's name is iberty. The -l part is saying that it is a |
| 9 |
> library. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libiberty/ |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I don't have access to my gentoo computer at the moment, so I can't |
| 14 |
> tell you where that comes from. But it is probably from either glibc, |
| 15 |
> gcc, or libstdc++. I expect the previous poster who told you to |
| 16 |
> remerge glibc knew the answer :) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> But if I am reading revdep-rebuild output correctly, it means that |
| 19 |
> your binutils is compiled to be linked against that library. But the |
| 20 |
> library cannot be found by revdep-rebuild. Hence the error. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> W |
| 23 |
libiberty.a comes from binutils. |
| 24 |
Looking at Stefan revdep-rebuild environment output it seems that |
| 25 |
revdep-rebuild doesn't handle 'include wildcard' statements in |
| 26 |
ld.so.conf. This bug is already reported #298651. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Mariusz Ceier |
Archives