| 1 |
Jarry <mr.jarry@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 01-Mar-12 21:29, walt wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 03/01/2012 09:55 AM, Jarry wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> What could be the problem? I remember just yesterday I updated |
| 6 |
> >> bind from 9.7.4_p1 to 9.8.1_p1, but today recompilation simply |
| 7 |
> >> failed... |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > I'm getting exactly the same error, so I'd say the ebuild is broken. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> You might be right. After resyncing portage today bind does not |
| 12 |
> want to be re-emerged (yet I did it just to be sure it works). |
| 13 |
> Short check revealed that "-static-libs%" has been removed from |
| 14 |
> use-flags... |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> <OT>: recently I noticed many times that a certain use-flag has |
| 17 |
> been activated for application, but removed a after a few days. |
| 18 |
> Not a big problem for "small" applications, but might be quite |
| 19 |
> annoying if I have to recompile gcc two times in two days, for |
| 20 |
> all of my servers. Seems to me like insufficient testing and |
| 21 |
> this should never happen in case of stable releases...</OT> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Jarry |
| 24 |
In bind 9.9.0 I am getting undefined access to main, so things seem to |
| 25 |
be getting much worse. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
| 29 |
How do |
| 30 |
you spend it? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
John Covici |
| 33 |
covici@××××××××××.com |
Archives