1 |
On Aug 20, 2012 10:12 PM, "Joerg Schilling" < |
2 |
Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > On Aug 20, 2012 8:51 PM, "Pandu Poluan" <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > On Aug 20, 2012 7:47 PM, "Andrea Conti" <alyf@××××.net> wrote: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > > +RW *can* be erased, or else it won't be called RW :-) |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > That said, the difference is much deeper than differing metadata. |
14 |
Among |
15 |
> > which : |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > * +RW uses Phase Modulation, -RW uses amplitude modulation. This gives |
18 |
> > +RW much more robustness than -RW |
19 |
> |
20 |
> This is also wrong: |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> DVD+RW use 817.4 kHz in the pregrove and periodically inverts the phase as |
24 |
> sector start marker. This is cheaper to press (as the stamper will last |
25 |
for more |
26 |
> press cycles) but it is not as accurate as DVD-RW and you get floating |
27 |
bader |
28 |
> quality during the life cycle of the stamper. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> DVD-RW uses 140.6 kHz in the pregrove and in addition lans pits between |
31 |
the |
32 |
> groves to mark the sector start, This is much more precise than what |
33 |
DVD+RW |
34 |
> uses. Since aproc. 4 years, there is a new patented stamper method that |
35 |
uses |
36 |
> dints in the pregrove instead of pits on top of the land. This is as |
37 |
precise as |
38 |
> the pit on land method, compatoble to this method and allows stampers |
39 |
that are |
40 |
> as cheap as the DVD+RW stampers. There is no degradaraion of the stamper |
41 |
> accuracy as with DVD+RW, even with the new modified version. |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
Thanks for the technical information, although honestly, most are beyond me |
45 |
:-P |
46 |
|
47 |
That said, care to refute the following page: |
48 |
|
49 |
http://www.myce.com/article/why-dvdrw-is-superior-to-dvd-rw-203/ |
50 |
|
51 |
because until someone publicly refute that article, I honestly will prefer |
52 |
+RW over -RW. |
53 |
|
54 |
(And, anecdotally, ever since I burn DVD's, I already had a stack of |
55 |
failing -RW discs, while having only two failing +RW discs. I might be just |
56 |
lucky, but since experience matches expectations (based on that article), |
57 |
luck seems to not have anything to do with it.) |
58 |
|
59 |
PS: I'm not trying to start a plus/minus war; I am sincerely interested, |
60 |
and will switch my preferred optical media if corrected. |
61 |
|
62 |
Rgds, |