1 |
Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Aug 20, 2012 8:51 PM, "Pandu Poluan" <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > On Aug 20, 2012 7:47 PM, "Andrea Conti" <alyf@××××.net> wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
> > +RW *can* be erased, or else it won't be called RW :-) |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > That said, the difference is much deeper than differing metadata. Among |
11 |
> which : |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > * +RW uses Phase Modulation, -RW uses amplitude modulation. This gives |
14 |
> +RW much more robustness than -RW |
15 |
|
16 |
This is also wrong: |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
DVD+RW use 817.4 kHz in the pregrove and periodically inverts the phase as |
20 |
sector start marker. This is cheaper to press (as the stamper will last for more |
21 |
press cycles) but it is not as accurate as DVD-RW and you get floating bader |
22 |
quality during the life cycle of the stamper. |
23 |
|
24 |
DVD-RW uses 140.6 kHz in the pregrove and in addition lans pits between the |
25 |
groves to mark the sector start, This is much more precise than what DVD+RW |
26 |
uses. Since aproc. 4 years, there is a new patented stamper method that uses |
27 |
dints in the pregrove instead of pits on top of the land. This is as precise as |
28 |
the pit on land method, compatoble to this method and allows stampers that are |
29 |
as cheap as the DVD+RW stampers. There is no degradaraion of the stamper |
30 |
accuracy as with DVD+RW, even with the new modified version. |
31 |
|
32 |
Jörg |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
EMail:joerg@××××××××××××××××××××××××.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin |
36 |
js@××××××××××××.de (uni) |
37 |
joerg.schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ |
38 |
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily |