1 |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:22:21AM +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
> > On Friday 12 February 2010 10:54:53 Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
5 |
> > > Hi, Gentoo, |
6 |
|
7 |
> > > My new Gentoo box has become unusably unstable. |
8 |
|
9 |
> > > The first sign was when the compiler threw a segfault whilst |
10 |
> > > emerging the xfce window manager. I "solved" this by emerging |
11 |
> > > Openbox instead. |
12 |
|
13 |
> > > Then I got another compiler segfault whilst emerging firefox (yes, |
14 |
> > > I know there's a binary for this). |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
> > everything you mention below is indicative of failing hardware, |
19 |
> > especially RAM closely followed by PSU. |
20 |
|
21 |
> Yes, you're right. :-( |
22 |
|
23 |
> When I run memtest86 from the gentoo boot disk, it signals millions of |
24 |
> failures in b11 of 32 bit words. |
25 |
|
26 |
> I'll try unplugging and replugging these. |
27 |
|
28 |
No help. :-( |
29 |
|
30 |
No matter how I plug in the RAM (4 combinations of 2 sticks into 2 pairs |
31 |
of slots) it is always b11 which fails and always at an address ending |
32 |
in (hex) 0 or 8. |
33 |
|
34 |
How is this DDR3 Ram organised? Is each stick 64 bits wide, or are they |
35 |
32 bits wide, being accessed by the motherboard pairwisely? If the |
36 |
latter, I would have exected the failure to move to address ....4 and |
37 |
....C when I swap the two sticks. Am I being prematurely pessimistic in |
38 |
thinking the motherboard might be the fault? |
39 |
|
40 |
> > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
41 |
|
42 |
> -- |
43 |
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |