From: | Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion? | ||
Date: | Sat, 19 Nov 2016 21:59:59 | ||
Message-Id: | CAOdo=Swzcjdih+=0hvKe8qV8nK-USHJm_og-R2roAWn5haoG6w@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion? by Miroslav Rovis |
1 | On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis |
2 | <miro.rovis@××××××××××××××.hr> wrote: |
3 | > |
4 | > Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! Have a |
5 | > look: |
6 | > |
7 | > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems |
8 | > |
9 | > There is no D-Bus under "Main dependencies" for OpenRC (I really like |
10 | > OpenRC...) |
11 | |
12 | There's no reason that the fact that OpenRC doesn't depend on dbus |
13 | should imply that something higher up the stack cannot depend on dbus! |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion? | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |