Archives
Archives
| From: | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:07:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 52E659F1.1090508@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably by Tanstaafl |
||
| 1 | On 27/01/2014 13:59, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 | > On 2014-01-26 1:04 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | >> So, not sure where your optimism comes from. But... some devs are |
| 4 | >> interested in starting from scratch or picking up pkgcore (which would |
| 5 | >> be the most sane thing to do IMO). |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > ? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > If the problem is really this potentially serious, why start from |
| 10 | > scratch, when Paludis is already very mature? Is it pure politics |
| 11 | > (someone just doesn't like Ciaran)? |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | No-one likes to admit it, but I think there's some NIH going on |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | Alan McKinnon |
| 21 | alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |