| 1 |
On 2013-08-11 1:06 PM, Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yes, I agree that that might perhaps have been nice to mention it in the news |
| 3 |
> item (although IMHO that's the sort of information the man pages are there |
| 4 |
> for), but it *is* crystal clear in the docs, or do you not count the man pages |
| 5 |
> to the docs? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Ok, you're right... :) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> AFAIK eselect profile uses the new location, but I don't remember how precisely |
| 10 |
> I moved it (not that it matters). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I just tried changing it |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
eselect profile set 3 |
| 15 |
eselect profile set 1 |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
and it didn't create the link in /etc/portage, it is still in /etc... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
>> Not sure why the two preceeding dots are there in the current one in |
| 20 |
>> /etc, but they are... |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The current location is /etc/make.conf, right? Then ../usr/[...] will resolve |
| 23 |
> to /usr/[...], whereas your ln command above will resolve to /etc/usr/[...], |
| 24 |
> which is, erm, wrong :) . |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So, to do this manually just: |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
~ ln -s make.profile /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/amd64/13.0 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
~ rm /etc/make.profile |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
? |
Archives