1 |
On 2010-02-23, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> With the downside being that the process is slower, as you |
4 |
> have to download each message or thread as you want to read |
5 |
> it. Contrast this with having email delivered whether you are |
6 |
> reading it or not and being filtered at the moment of arrival |
7 |
> so it is instantly available, sorted into folders, when you |
8 |
> start up your client. |
9 |
|
10 |
I get the impression you always read the mailing lists on a |
11 |
single machine? I read Gmane's "lists" from 4-5 different |
12 |
machines and locations. Duplicating all that mail locally on |
13 |
all those machines would be a pain. |
14 |
|
15 |
> However, this convenience uses more bandwidth, so if that is |
16 |
> worth more to you than your time, using Usenet for selective |
17 |
> reading does make sense. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Hello... IRON |
21 |
at CURTAIN? Send over a |
22 |
visi.com SAUSAGE PIZZA! World War |
23 |
III? No thanks! |