| 1 |
Am 12.07.2013 18:36, schrieb Timur Aydin: |
| 2 |
> On 7/5/2013 11:12 PM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I since did some googling and it seems I am right and he just thought I |
| 4 |
>> was some know nothing guy he could sell some service too. Anyway, has |
| 5 |
>> anything changed to make Linux more prone to viruses than it used to |
| 6 |
>> be? I read a percentage somewhere that said like 99% of viruses are |
| 7 |
>> windoze only. Is there a indisputable source of information on this? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Linux is inherently more secure than Windows, but it isn't so much |
| 10 |
> more secure that only 1% of all viruses can attack it. Virus |
| 11 |
> developers don't have a financial incentive to develop Linux viruses |
| 12 |
> (not enough Linux users, most Linux users knowledgeable about |
| 13 |
> computers, and moral reasons). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
moral reasons... you just made my day.... |
Archives