1 |
Richard Fish schrieb: |
2 |
> On 8/21/06, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@×××××.at> wrote: |
3 |
>> Do I have to do "emerge -e --newuse world" on my system or what else |
4 |
>> would be needed? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> --newuse is not needed here. "emerge -e world" will catch everything. |
7 |
|
8 |
Got that from one of the zillions of howtos ... |
9 |
Reading the manpage would have told me to drop --newuse, on the other |
10 |
hand it doesn't seem to do harm here ... |
11 |
|
12 |
>> I am not asking this to get the "best result" in terms of speed or |
13 |
>> performance, but to make sure that I don't break my system (which has |
14 |
>> been backed up, sure, thanks ...). |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Changing CFLAGS should not cause any breakage. So the choice is |
17 |
> entirely up to you whether you want to wait for an "emerge -e system" |
18 |
> or "emerge -e world" to complete. I would be tempted to just change |
19 |
> the flags and hold off on recompiling everything until the next |
20 |
> version of gcc comes out. |
21 |
|
22 |
( ... "next version" in terms of minor- or major-version?) |
23 |
|
24 |
I see the point in this. (AFAIK there is no way to break up "emerge -e |
25 |
xy" into smaller pieces, something to do in several separated steps. |
26 |
>From your posting I conclude that it also won't do any harm to re-emerge |
27 |
selected parts with new CFLAGS?) |
28 |
|
29 |
So does it make *any* sense to re-emerge stuff like OO.org or |
30 |
Thunderbird? Maybe I will let my small distcc-cluster work on this ... |
31 |
what else should it do? :-) |
32 |
|
33 |
Apart from this I have enough computer-related experience to know that I |
34 |
simply should be happy with the |
35 |
luks-encrypted/cpufreq'ed/hibernating/etc. gentoo-system I now have at |
36 |
hand, instead of spending numerous hours to gain minimal speedups. |
37 |
|
38 |
And I am. |
39 |
|
40 |
Thanks a lot, Stefan. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |