| 1 |
-----Original Message----- |
| 2 |
From: Allan Gottlieb [mailto:gottlieb@×××.edu] |
| 3 |
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:16 PM |
| 4 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 5 |
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: default stage3 |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
At Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:13:14 +0100 "Hemmann, Volker Armin" |
| 8 |
<volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> On Monday 21 November 2005 13:33, Steve B wrote: |
| 11 |
>> WTF.. I'm getting ready to rebuild my gentoo box. I have always did a |
| 12 |
stage |
| 13 |
>> 1 install. i was under the impression that if u used a stage 3 u couldn't |
| 14 |
>> muck with your CFLAGS or what not. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
3. If you fiddle with USE flags, /etc/package.* files, etc, you can |
| 17 |
get the effect of a customized stage1 install by recompiling |
| 18 |
everything twice. I suspect simply |
| 19 |
emerge -e world; emerge -e world |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
3A. Only a few items really need to be compiled the first time. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
3B. There are scripts in the forums to do this "automatically". |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I installed gentoo on a dual Opteron box this weekend, I've always done |
| 27 |
stage1 installs, but this time decided to try the recommeded stage3 method. |
| 28 |
I understand the concept of doing an "emerge -e world" in order to get the |
| 29 |
optimization of a stage1 install, and I've done this ( one time ) on the |
| 30 |
install I just completed. Can sombody explain why it's necessary/desirable |
| 31 |
to do this *twice*? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
What real difference does the second execution really make? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Thanks, |
| 36 |
Bob Young |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives