Archives
Archives
| From: | R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] single core athlon? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 09 Jan 2018 02:44:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAAD4mYg33=7uSshqbuoODCGmP0hWXQQt7k1itMRORjma+Y6=QQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] single core athlon? by Walter Dnes |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 | > There are "athlons" and then there are "athlons". Check the gcc page |
| 3 | > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.4.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#x86-Options |
| 4 | > for an idea of what's what. You need at least the "k8" version. The |
| 5 | > ultimate way to find out is to download the amd64 minimal install ISO |
| 6 | > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Full/Installation#Obtain_the_media |
| 7 | > and try to boot off it. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I was under the impression that disabling SMP on single core systems |
| 11 | could lead to a performance increase, but wasn't necessary. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Is the deciding factor actually processor family? And - there are GCC |
| 14 | versions or distributions that have already dropped support for x86_64 |
| 15 | processors? I'd only read about 32 bit families being dropped. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] single core athlon? | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |