Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Any thoughts on Intel Skylake SGX? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:08:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_m6jvwiHAfxvUow8_dzOt_GsRDTz3qcJ0tMtm1fpZQ6ow@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Any thoughts on Intel Skylake SGX? by Frank Steinmetzger |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Well my concern was more that SGX would provide leverage for even more |
| 4 | > eavesdropping, rather than prohibit it. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Yeah, I'm one of those persons who tends to consider most fears of |
| 8 | TPMs and UEFI overblown, but these CPUs that almost have independent |
| 9 | CPUs inside with full RAM+hardware access which are secured against |
| 10 | the main CPU do concern me quite a bit. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Any thoughts on Intel Skylake SGX? | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |