1 |
Well, *something* is trying to access a function that doesnt exist in NDB; |
2 |
whether we know what it does or why, I'm guessing it's a behaviour that |
3 |
shouldn't happen :P. |
4 |
|
5 |
I suppose whatever tries to access NDB has a bug in it... but what would |
6 |
that be? |
7 |
|
8 |
On 27/09/05, Holly Bostick <motub@××××××.nl> wrote: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Phill MV schreef: |
11 |
> > That makes me feel much better. On a related note, shouldn't we be |
12 |
> > filing bug reports, then? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Never occurred to me since it was a PEBKAC (problem existing between |
15 |
> keyboard and chair, to save people having to look it up). The only |
16 |
> reason NBD was compiled into the kernel was because I put it there, |
17 |
> having mysteriously forgotten that I had gotten along fine without it |
18 |
> for some time, and having suddenly conceived a conviction that it was |
19 |
> some kind of missing link to a network paradise of some sort. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Which it may well be, but not for my home network of two puny PCs. I |
22 |
> don't know what came over me. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> And I definitely don't know what kind of a bug 'should' be filed, if I |
25 |
> thought one was needed. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Holly |
28 |
> -- |
29 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |