| 1 |
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:12, Nick Rout wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Derek Tracy wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Part way through the online handbook I noticed that |
| 6 |
> > they standardized the Stage3 install. I figured that since the developers |
| 7 |
> > thought it was best to use a Stage3 install then why not give it a shot. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I read your message and was surprised at this. Last time I read the |
| 10 |
> handbooks the Handbook gave stage 1/2/3 options and the 2005.1 handbook |
| 11 |
> stuck to stage 3. (Talking x86 here, I have never done an instal on |
| 12 |
> other architectures). |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Now, like you, I read this in the Handbook: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> "Make sure you download a stage3 tarball - installations using a stage1 or |
| 17 |
> stage2 tarball are not supported anymore." |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
To be honest, this is the first time i see this. I always did stage 1 |
| 20 |
installs. Haven't done so in a while that's why I'm a little surprised about |
| 21 |
this. |
| 22 |
What exactly were the reasons for such a move? |
Archives