Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail?
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:57:53
Message-Id: 20100211115054.GB14006@waltdnes.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail? by Volker Armin Hemmann
1 On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
2 > On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote:
3 > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another
4 > > desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years).
5 >
6 > yeah good luck with that. Because gnome is moving in that direction too.
7
8 There are other desktops besides GNOME and KDE. Actually I prefer the
9 ICEWM window manager. I was running a 1999 Dell 450mhz PIII with 128
10 megs of *SYSTEM* ram until the summer of 2007. Let's just say that
11 GNOME and KDE were out of the question for me. On my current desktop,
12 ICEWM flies. But I also have a netbook, and again GNOME and KDE are not
13 usable.
14
15 > Seriously guys, you start sounding like luddites. Is new, must be bad.
16
17 Correction, is fat, bloated, and slow, must be bad. I wonder if
18 Microsoft's anti-linux strategy is to have its agents infiltrate the
19 linux developer community, and turn linux into bloatware.
20
21 --
22 Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail? Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Has semantic-desktop really become compulsatory for kmail? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>