| 1 |
On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another |
| 6 |
> > > desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years). |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > yeah good luck with that. Because gnome is moving in that direction too. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> There are other desktops besides GNOME and KDE. Actually I prefer the |
| 11 |
> ICEWM window manager. I was running a 1999 Dell 450mhz PIII with 128 |
| 12 |
> megs of *SYSTEM* ram until the summer of 2007. Let's just say that |
| 13 |
> GNOME and KDE were out of the question for me. On my current desktop, |
| 14 |
> ICEWM flies. But I also have a netbook, and again GNOME and KDE are not |
| 15 |
> usable. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > Seriously guys, you start sounding like luddites. Is new, must be bad. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Correction, is fat, bloated, and slow, must be bad. I wonder if |
| 20 |
> Microsoft's anti-linux strategy is to have its agents infiltrate the |
| 21 |
> linux developer community, and turn linux into bloatware. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You have been corrected on this point so many times I now think you are just a |
| 24 |
stupid ass. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
It is not slow. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
You are the only one saying that. People who do use Nepomuk say that it is not |
| 29 |
slow and does not hog resources (initial scan excepted). |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Are you seriously just shooting your mouth off about something you know didly- |
| 32 |
squat about? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives