Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Ryan Sims <rwsims@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:56:21
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation by Steen Eugen Poulsen
1 On 8/31/07, Steen Eugen Poulsen <sep@×××××××××.net> wrote:
2 > Ryan Sims skrev:
3 > > Please stop using inflammatory language. Everyone. If you must have
4 > > an argument, start a new thread or take it off list. It's perfectly
5 > > fine for someone to criticize genkernel, or portage, or a hammer, or a
6 > > car, or any other tool. It's also fine if you disagree with their
7 > > criticisms, that's what's so great about a diverse community like
8 > > gentoo; so many viewpoints. Daniels reply to your post is well said,
9 > > and a perfectly valid objection to Volker's crticism, words like
10 > > "hate" "drivel" "FUD" and such are *not*.
11 >
12 > Show me where Volker is actually giving critisim. All he does is make
13 > up stories that has nothing to do with what genkernel actually does.
15 My apologies, I didn't mean to be defending anyone. I *would* like
16 *one of you* to admit to your invective, apologize and move one. I
17 won't hold my breath, but it'd be nice.
19 [snip]
21 Ok, I've decided I'm doing more damage than good here. Arnau, if you
22 want to take this off list away from the static (much of it generated
23 by me, apologies), please feel free to email me, I'll help as far as I
24 can. Otherwise, I think it best that I shut the hell up.
26 --
27 Ryan W Sims
28 --
29 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx>