| 1 |
It's pretty simple, either disable it if you dont need it. if you do, |
| 2 |
you've got 2 options .. module or compile in .. ? Why make it so |
| 3 |
difficult ? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Mar 21, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 9 |
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:00:52 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>>> What is this and why is it so persistent about it having to be |
| 13 |
>>> there? I'm fine with it being built in but I just don't like |
| 14 |
>>> modules. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Then don't set CONFIG_MODULES ;-) |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Changed that now. It sort of puked when I ran make by asking this: |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Enable loadable module support (MODULES) [N/y/?] (NEW) N |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Now I get this: |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. |
| 29 |
> Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. |
| 30 |
> Then build a kernel with module support enabled. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> make: *** [modules_install] Error 1 |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Apparently it doesn't like the idea. Now what? Do I have to have |
| 36 |
> modules because of this mess? o_O |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Thanks. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> Dale |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> :-) :-) -- |
| 43 |
> gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives