1 |
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 20:14, Billy Holmes wrote: |
2 |
[....] |
3 |
> I use ext3 on an external harddrive, as I believe in the data recovery |
4 |
> aspects of ext3. For my desktop machines, I use xfs. For servers, I use |
5 |
> ext3 unless I really feel I need the extra performance, then I use xfs. |
6 |
|
7 |
You really *do* speak out of my mind ;-) Well, I share the same oppinions |
8 |
about these FSs and have the same fs setups as you (obviousely!). |
9 |
|
10 |
> > I do not know of any Linux filesystem that can be resized while still |
11 |
> > mounted. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> $ man xfs_growfs |
14 |
[...] |
15 |
> you *must* have the filesystem mounted in order to use xfs_growfs. XFS |
16 |
> lends itself VERY well to lvm2 (which also runs on all my desktops). |
17 |
|
18 |
This confused me the first time I wanted to growfs my /home; However, it has |
19 |
been a little bit funny aswell, as ext3 (originally) only supported offline |
20 |
growings. |
21 |
|
22 |
However, I once have (accidently!) thrown down one harddrive of mine from |
23 |
within 60cm distance down while moving to a new tower/rac; I were nearly |
24 |
crying about, but before, I quickly invoked fsck.xfs on my LVM (which this |
25 |
disk is part of) and *really* got confused. |
26 |
fsck.xfs is really a no-op. I couldn't figure out yet why. I can now just pray |
27 |
that everything seems to go just well (as it does till now ;) |
28 |
|
29 |
Regards, |
30 |
Christian Parpart. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
20:26:55 up 139 days, 9:34, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.08, 0.08 |