| 1 |
In <4860f3f2.ymAUFfyQlp8koUnJ%Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de>, |
| 2 |
Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I am trying to ignore the attacks from the people behind cdrkit and I |
| 5 |
> hope that people realize that progress is only in the official |
| 6 |
> project. I however need to inform people correctly when I see |
| 7 |
> incorrect claims on my projects. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
"Informing" by saying things like "all known forks are full of bugs" |
| 10 |
doesn't help, as it's indistinguishable from FUD. In fact, the more |
| 11 |
you say it, the more it looks like FUD. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> If you like to live with the big number of bugs in the fork, go |
| 14 |
> ahead, but you only harm yourself. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I've just read your outdated page |
| 17 |
<http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html>. Where you listed |
| 18 |
specific bugs, I see they don't affect me (and can't imagine they'd |
| 19 |
affect most users). Most of what you cite as bugs are just features |
| 20 |
they haven't implemented yet (and for all I know, they have since you |
| 21 |
wrote that page). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
»Q« |
| 25 |
Kleeneness is next to Gödelness. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives