| 1 |
On 2013-04-02, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> No, you are stilling misunderstanding. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
He's not the only one. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> The news item goes to great lengths to explain that there is a new |
| 8 |
> way and it is different from the old way. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I did grok that much. I had a 70-persistent-net.rules file that named |
| 11 |
my three interfaces "eth0" "eth1" and "eth2" based on their MAC |
| 12 |
addresses. After reading the news item and flameeyes blog, I was still |
| 13 |
pretty much at a loss regarding what I was actually supposed to _do_. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
In Flameyes blog, he showed an example of using udev rules pretty much |
| 16 |
identical to the ones I already had, so I couldn't figure out what was |
| 17 |
different (other than the default interface names, which still aren't |
| 18 |
really predictable). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
In the end, I just did the upgrade and rebooted. My existing rules |
| 21 |
seemed to work fine: the interfaces came up with the same names as |
| 22 |
before. So I gave up trying to figure it out... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Of course, you |
| 26 |
at UNDERSTAND about the PLAIDS |
| 27 |
gmail.com in the SPIN CYCLE -- |
Archives