| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2012-09-17 9:35 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Hi all, |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> I thought I'd posted about this way back when I opened the bug at |
| 7 |
>> sourceforge: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3494798&group_id=80013&atid=558446 |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> but didn't find anything in my local archives, so I guess I didn't... |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Does anyone use clucene? I'm planning on enabling FTS (full text search) |
| 16 |
>> on a new dovecot server, and was planning on using clucene, but would |
| 17 |
>> like to see about getting this warning taken care of (if it is indedd |
| 18 |
>> something I need to be worried about)... |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Never mind, just got a reply from the dev that he had fixed it and the next |
| 22 |
> update would contain the fix... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I'm still curious if I should not go down that road and use something else |
| 25 |
> for FTS... |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
clucene looks like the thing to use right now, unless you want to use |
| 29 |
the full Java-based Apache Lucene. I was just looking at it this |
| 30 |
morning as a possible basis for a solution to a problem of my own[1], |
| 31 |
since strigi uses it. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
[1] http://mmol-6453.livejournal.com/279757.html |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
:wq |
Archives