1 |
On 11/09/2012 03:13 PM, pk wrote: |
2 |
> On 2012-11-09 23:53, walt wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> You Lennart haters out there (and I was one of you not so long ago ;) |
5 |
>> now I think he's not so bad after all. He just doesn't know yet how to |
6 |
>> explain things properly to old farts. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Good for you. I really don't see the point in preaching systemd's |
9 |
> greatness (or Lennart's). I'm not going to try it anyway. |
10 |
|
11 |
:) systemd is coming whether you or I like it or not so I'm trying to stay a bit ahead of the tsunami, that's all. |
12 |
|
13 |
The emotions started running high when Lennart pushed pulseaudio on us awhile ago, and he's doing it again now with systemd. I didn't see the purpose for pulse until I (finally) bought a new computer with audio hardware I'd never seen before, and then I finally understood why he invented this silly pulse nonsense. |
14 |
|
15 |
I still don't quite understand the entire motivation behind systemd but I'll bet it will become obvious to me in the future. |
16 |
|
17 |
> Also, I really don't see a point in booting fast |
18 |
|
19 |
A speedy reboot is very nice for those of use who compile and test a new kernel from Linus every morning and file kernel bug reports when appropriate. If I do find a kernel bug I may need to recompile/reboot many times as quickly as my machine can do it, so saving 15-20 seconds per reboot cycle just feels less painful :) |
20 |
|
21 |
> (and I don't see anything wrong with |
22 |
> openrc). So why do you feel the need to preach? Just curious... |
23 |
|
24 |
I didn't intend to preach, I intended to brag that I got it working :p |