Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage-2.2.0_alpha38 & --depclean
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:22:19
Message-Id: BANLkTi=RJ716V6z3+R1PZUxdi6m2w6rYgQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] portage-2.2.0_alpha38 & --depclean by Neil Bothwick
1 On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:39:34 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
3 >
4 >>    What I didn't like about this issue popping up yesterday is that it
5 >> altered the idea that average users never touch anything in @system.
6 >> Iin fact, TTBOMK I've never in 11 or 12 years of running Gentoo ever
7 >> done an emerge -C on a @system package until this morning when I
8 >> removed nano.
9 >
10 > That's the point though, nano is not a system package, it is not needed
11 > for Gentoo to be usable. You need an editor, but it does not have to be
12 > nano, that is simply the default if the user makes no other choice.
13 >
14 > Forcing nano into @system goes against the whole idea of using virtuals
15 > to specify required functionality, rather than requiring a specific
16 > program.
17 >
18
19 That's what I thought until I moved to the kde profile, at which time
20 it seems to about 80% of kde-meta became part of @system. Prior to
21 switching to that profile I think @system as about 150 packages. Today
22 it's 389:
23
24 2stable ~ # emerge -epv @system
25
26 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
27
28 Calculating dependencies... done!
29 [ebuild R ] sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5-r2 475 kB
30 [ebuild R ] virtual/libintl-0 0 kB
31 <SNIP>
32 [ebuild R ] kde-base/kdesu-4.6.2 USE="handbook (-aqua) -debug
33 (-kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix)" 0 kB
34 [ebuild R ] kde-misc/polkit-kde-kcmodules-0.98_pre20101127
35 USE="(-aqua) -debug (-kdeenablefinal)" 0 kB
36 [ebuild R ] kde-base/khelpcenter-4.6.2 USE="(-aqua) -debug
37 (-kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix)" 0 kB
38
39 Total: 389 packages (9 new, 380 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 308,431 kB
40 c2stable ~ #
41
42 My thought at this point is that WRT @system the devs are doing
43 something magic with Gentoo, taking it in some new direction which I
44 don't understand yet, and because of that I'm likely to be confused
45 for some time to come. The idea of a virtual seems very reasonable to
46 me, but somehow it seems the implementation of it all just isn't as
47 clear to me as it should be, and the onus is on me to go learn and not
48 the devs to teach me.
49
50 Cheers,
51 Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] portage-2.2.0_alpha38 & --depclean Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] portage-2.2.0_alpha38 & --depclean Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>