Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: karl@××××××××.se
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: *dev-less gentoo
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 21:26:06
Message-Id: 20160118212550.92A0981053DB@turkos.aspodata.se
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: *dev-less gentoo by Alan McKinnon
1 Alan McKinnon:
2 > On 18/01/2016 23:05, karl@××××××××.se wrote:
3 ...
4 > > I found a workaround in the sys-fs/static-dev package.
5 > Let's be clear: static-dev is NOT a workaround. It is a full proper
6 > solution for the case when a dynamic device node solution is not desired.
7
8 Ok, fine with me (the wording "dev-manager" go me off track).
9
10 > Of course it means you have to mknod every device you need yourself. But
11 > you know that going in right?
12
13 Yes (though I alreade have a /dev from before).
14
15 Regards,
16 /Karl Hammar
17
18 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
19 Aspö Data
20 Lilla Aspö 148
21 S-742 94 Östhammar
22 Sweden
23 +46 173 140 57

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: *dev-less gentoo James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>