Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} ISP requires MTU below 1500?
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:33:04
Message-Id: CAN0CFw3gwKXRgqhnbvCHMntyONMTBJq5vuSMni=RXx85U=fNNw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} ISP requires MTU below 1500? by Kai Krakow
1 >> >> Maybe run a ping to a destination which you are having problems
2 >> >> with, then reproduce the problem (with the network idle
3 >> >> otherwise). You should see ping packets dropped only then.
4 >> >>
5 >> >> You can also ping with increasing packet sizes (see ping --help)
6 >> >> and see when the packet becomes too big for path MTU. But instead
7 >> >> lowering your MTU then, you should allow icmp-fragmentation-needed
8 >> >> come through reliably. Lowering MTU only makes sense to stop
9 >> >> overly fragmentation in the first place and optimize for a
10 >> >> specific packet path (like traffic through one or multiple VPN
11 >> >> tunnels) where fragmentation would otherwise increase latency a
12 >> >> lot, or where icmp-frag-needed does not correctly work.
13 >> >
14 >> >
15 >> > I'll try pinging today once the issue pops up.
16 >>
17 >>
18 >> I'm seeing the issue again as usual but ping response times come back
19 >> normal at about 50ms. I'll keep trying.
20 >
21 > Not sure if this came after or before switching your router to modem
22 > mode... But if it happened before and is solved now, your router really
23 > doesn't well with icmp packets or has problems with mss clamping / pmtu.
24
25
26 I did not try pinging before switching the device from router to modem.
27
28 BTW, I read that setting CLAMPMSS=Yes in shorewall.conf is a necessity
29 when using PPPoE but my connection is working fine without that
30 setting. Should I set it anyway?
31
32 - Grant

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} ISP requires MTU below 1500? Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com>