| 1 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht<nicolas.s-dev@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing |
| 8 |
>>> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing |
| 9 |
>>> lists I use don't do that. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it |
| 12 |
>>> permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole |
| 13 |
>>> mailing list. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> What do you think about changing of policy? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Like others, I'm happy with this as it is. But YMMV. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> When they start a new list and it is not set up this way, it causes |
| 20 |
> confusion. This was discussed before on another list. I don't see |
| 21 |
> this changing anytime soon and hope it doesn't. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Is there a way for someone to add another address to Reply-To? (Does the |
| 24 |
list management software overwrite the header or just appends its |
| 25 |
address?) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Such a way would suit the OP and people who don't want duplicate |
| 28 |
messages at the same time. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Meanwhile the OP might want to add a request to be CC'ed to his |
| 31 |
signature. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Nuno J. Silva |
| 35 |
gopher://sdf-eu.org/1/users/njsg |
Archives