1 |
On 4/25/21 12:14 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: |
2 |
> Nope. Many years ago I used UUCP a number of times for "production" |
3 |
> projects involving data gathering from remote systems via dial-up. |
4 |
|
5 |
:-) |
6 |
|
7 |
> 25+ years ago, I wrote an article about one of those projects for |
8 |
> Linux Journal. |
9 |
|
10 |
Can you narrow that down any more? I'd like to go find a copy of it and |
11 |
read it. |
12 |
|
13 |
> UUCP would work a treat for the problem I initially posed. |
14 |
|
15 |
:-) |
16 |
|
17 |
> Back in the day, I always used Taylor-UUCP, and I'm pretty sure I could |
18 |
> get it working again on Linux, but I have little confidence I could |
19 |
> get it working on Win10. |
20 |
|
21 |
I'm quite confident that Taylor-UUCP can be made to work on contemporary |
22 |
Linux and macOS (Big Sur and it's predecessors) as I've got exactly that |
23 |
working. What's more, I've got it working across SSH as a transport in |
24 |
lieu of serial connections. |
25 |
|
26 |
> I'd probably have better luck with Kermit. |
27 |
|
28 |
Please elaborate. |
29 |
|
30 |
I know very little about Kermit. I've looked at it a number of times |
31 |
over the last 20 years, but it's never presented a feature that I |
32 |
couldn't do with other things. I don't know if I'm just too late to the |
33 |
Kermit game to properly appreciate it or if I'm completely missing |
34 |
something. |
35 |
|
36 |
My fear is that Kermit would be more manual for transferring files one |
37 |
at a time. Maybe I'm wrong. |
38 |
|
39 |
Hence, please elaborate about Kermit. ;-) |
40 |
|
41 |
> It turns out the initial requirements that I was given were wrong, and |
42 |
> the Windows machine does have some limited Internet access via a VPN |
43 |
> and proxy, and I can get files to/from the Windows machine that way. |
44 |
|
45 |
~chuckle~ |
46 |
|
47 |
That happens. |
48 |
|
49 |
> So my initial question is moot. |
50 |
|
51 |
;-) |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
Grant. . . . |
57 |
unix || die |