1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 03/10/2013 06:00 PM, Michael Mol wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> It's been ages since I looked at that link and longer addresses |
7 |
>> would certainly be needed anyway but certainly with DNSSEC again |
8 |
>> concocted by costly unthoughtful and unengaging groups who chose |
9 |
>> to ignore DJB and enable amplification attacks. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> What from DJB did they ignore? I honestly don't know what you're |
12 |
> talking about. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
This was a non-sequitur as far as I can tell, but I remember the |
16 |
amplification attack from a talk: |
17 |
|
18 |
http://vimeo.com/18279777 (video) |
19 |
http://cr.yp.to/talks/2010.12.28/slides.pdf (slides) |
20 |
|
21 |
It was a really good talk, however you feel about DJB. |
22 |
|
23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
24 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
25 |
|
26 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRPTnkAAoJEBxJck0inpOia6EP/1Bu1rhx5cCi6/bl/J3MeJm3 |
27 |
CAaGXQG6iSnxxIXVqVXTs2fioZH2f3Xsq3jvKBoAQfil2ocGQa4LAPSGbLYX99xr |
28 |
XodEfm530EDK02UsqnyGHX2pzFQzUR/cQ0/SFpd8tMtEiYRdASIT6VtqoJoQWsoA |
29 |
unvPvK6xxHhH/YwmB+miPUSVl1nvmqT6Z7OKmpQL+MRHCQFvyk7SeClVf8OmAPkn |
30 |
NX/m3pSbsHdAtj6QP6CU8nAF1QbgWehhvZkx8UxqwPz8n8AO1JfY+zG669B5F6u+ |
31 |
MRcnN1s6jgIVoAgeqvgDjUC8JnkQTGBg3Lkdrv9IcM7N/+4ILvlH6h3IeSiI6unU |
32 |
hnganpVCl0q03N+qRi3JsHfdR/ZNBEetkplOai/QKyUltKohGG4LLPbqBFEdg+NP |
33 |
nVWz/Y4wn3h2uasClfIbehxSQDKlbHCvKOLp/dEmcFsra29vAF3pu15V1okmqdwF |
34 |
qzwf1k7nxoyjCT4YVnQv7F9OwnyYwm3nEmOjQyShJZN3gN82/4b+1R0LyhjeOled |
35 |
WcF8dnuxNpITjr1OusQ9MUeYmotWX2dj+//6zsrwZVs3QTNyOHx5VVe9Bl3DdcKr |
36 |
lFthQKyjsQAGgMD7zFoy4JxPReBwTQhu/QGcGKVKLIVRlTJ0XRQWVHUijlVY6dqB |
37 |
lIZu+xpwtY8OeZ20e+BC |
38 |
=knjT |
39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |