Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 21:57:23
Message-Id: CAGfcS_kRTTc1NOi=QX6wNdebNGOR8A2BKW1eS34vB6oRO1jHxg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs by gevisz
1 On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:52 PM, gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > However, it probably won't be sooner than
4 > # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask
5 > world --exclude chromium
6 > fails because of the "--exclude chromium" part :), as I have already compiled
7 > the recent vertion of chromium with /var/tmp/portage on the hard disk and
8 > it took more than 24 hours on my old AMD Athlon X2 with j2 option. :(
9 >
10
11 Honestly I doubt that tmpfs will make much difference since this is
12 probably CPU-bound.
13
14 Using the jumbo-build option probably will help a lot more - but it
15 will use even more RAM and might make a tmpfs impractical for you. I
16 bet that jumbo-build on a spinning disk will be faster for you than
17 not using that option on a tmpfs. But, there is only one way to be
18 sure.
19
20 --
21 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: /var/tmp on tmpfs Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com>