| 1 |
On 01/20/2010 11:39 PM, walt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/19/2010 10:26 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 01/19/2010 07:55 PM, walt wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 01/18/2010 04:41 PM, walt wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> Here is what I see on both machines: |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> $su |
| 9 |
>>>> Password: <===== I type Ctrl-d here |
| 10 |
>>>> Segmentation fault |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> I've traced this problem to the pam_ssh package, which is supposed |
| 13 |
>>>> to return a charstring containing the typed password, but it instead |
| 14 |
>>>> returns a null pointer when I type Ctrl-d. Calamity ensues. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> The key here is the pam_ssh package, which apparently the rest of you |
| 17 |
>>> don't use for authentication. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> Just a quick question: what do you need PAM for? No it's not a |
| 20 |
>> rhetorical question. I always wondered what PAM is good for; to find |
| 21 |
>> out, I completely removed everything PAM related from my system |
| 22 |
>> ("-pam" in make.conf and then rebuild everything and then |
| 23 |
>> depclean.) The system works exactly the same as before. So I'm left |
| 24 |
>> wondering what PAM was doing in the first place? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I'm no expert on PAM, but I've seen it used on every linux distribution |
| 27 |
> that I've tried over the years. In the case I just described, I used it |
| 28 |
> so I can identify myself with my ssh key, which is much more secure than |
| 29 |
> a password. So, in general, pam is used to set security policy for how |
| 30 |
> users can log in, change their passwords, etc. I'm not sure how I would |
| 31 |
> have added ssh key authentication without pam. It's a good question. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Well, all of this is still working here without PAM, including keys |
| 34 |
(I've set that option in the config file of the ssh deamon, not PAM.) |
Archives