| 1 |
Thierry de Coulon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I've got 2 GB and it will (have to) stay so |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Okay, so you won't need one of the main features of 64bit machines - |
| 6 |
larger addressable space of RAM. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Will you do number crunching with floating point numbers or with |
| 9 |
large integers? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If not, then you won't use those advantages either. Somebody correct |
| 12 |
me, but if you want to WORK with this machine (ie. not fiddle), I'd |
| 13 |
suggest to stay 32bit. Or what advantages would 64bit provide? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
After a time, you may find that "having" is not so pleasing a thing, |
| 18 |
after all, as "wanting." It is not logical, but it is often true. |
| 19 |
-- Spock, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7 |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives