| 1 |
Wol's lists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 09/06/18 18:09, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
... |
| 5 |
> > downsides as well, in particular it is certainly more complex and at |
| 6 |
> > work we practically forbid any kind of windows ACLs at anything other |
| 7 |
> > than the top mount level because it is so hard to control. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Windows is better than POSIX?! That doesn't say much for POSIX then, |
| 10 |
> seeing as I feel Windows ACLs are overly complex and difficult! |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Well, "Windows ACLs" is the only ACL system that is standardized (as part of |
| 13 |
the NFSv4 standard). The old proposal in POSIX.1e from 1993 from Sun has been |
| 14 |
withdrawn in 1997 since the customers did not like it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Jörg |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
EMail:joerg@××××××.net (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin |
| 20 |
joerg.schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ |
| 21 |
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/' |
Archives