Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Martins Steinbergs <mar@××.lv>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack!
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:58:10
Message-Id: 200507250453.59624.mar@ml.lv
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack! by maxim wexler
1 had same problem, solved rebuilding mbr
2 check fdisk, if same problem (16 heads instead of 255 heads) this will help
3
4 http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user%40lists.gentoo.org/msg07969.html
5
6 On Monday 25 July 2005 03:39, maxim wexler wrote:
7 > Hello everybody,
8 >
9 > You may recall my tussle with an Sempron/Asus K8N-e
10 > box: first it wouldn't boot but I fixed that and then
11 > the entire unit died.
12 >
13 > The tech at Asus suggested I *reverse* the CMOS
14 > battery for a few seconds. I was skeptical but it
15 > seems to have done the trick.
16 >
17 > However LBA remains 'off' for my Maxtor120G HD in the
18 > POST even though it's listed as LBA-capable in the
19 > BIOS and LBA is also set to 'auto' in the BIOS.
20 >
21 > Also gentoo boots but not WinXP.
22 >
23 > To recap: I moved all my boot stuff to a 200M HD,
24 > mounted as Pri-Master. The Maxtor 120G(Pri-Slave) was
25 > split nearly in two with WinXP on the first half,
26 > gentoo on the 2nd.
27 >
28 > When I try to boot WinXP I get:
29 >
30 > rootnoverify (hd1,0)#2nd drive,first partition,right?
31 > makeactive
32 > chainloader +1
33 >
34 > then the cursor advances a couple of lines and just
35 > sits there blinking.
36 >
37 > Does WinXP absolutely have to be the first partition
38 > on the first drive? What if I made the 200M the slave
39 > and re-did grub, could I still boot from it.
40 >
41 > -mw
42 >
43 >
44 >
45 > ____________________________________________________
46 > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
47 > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
48 --
49 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] He's baaaaaack! maxim wexler <blissfix@×××××.com>