| 1 |
Just because google does it, does not mean it's right. If you are going to |
| 2 |
make a suggestion, please |
| 3 |
make it an educated one. For example: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
"I prefer RHEL because of it's mature GFS, and CMAN support which is Red |
| 6 |
Hat's implementation of |
| 7 |
global file system and cluster computing." |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Or you could even sound funny saying it but add valuable input |
| 10 |
nevertheless. Some thing like: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
"I think SLES is the shizaooo for clustering because of it's continued |
| 13 |
support of Pacemaker Cluster, DRBD, |
| 14 |
GFS, OCFS2 etc...." |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Just saying I like something because google does, is not valuable input. To |
| 17 |
be honest, it's just as a waste of time |
| 18 |
to read as it is to write. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Debian, and Ubuntu are desktop platforms. Yes they are widely used in |
| 21 |
production server environments (the slow |
| 22 |
ones that is) however, our last experience with Debian squeeze as a whole |
| 23 |
(ie, source tree, reliability, performance), |
| 24 |
was inhospitable. Dare I say, it was making as nauseated as we would be |
| 25 |
behind a Windows machine... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That being said, the OP did not specify the type of cluster. Is he |
| 28 |
referring to HPLC (Oscar, Rocks, MPI) or Failover |
| 29 |
cluster for certain services such as HTTP, SSH etc.. as is provided by |
| 30 |
CMAN, Pacemaker. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
What has worked really solid for us due to many factors, and the idea of |
| 34 |
being able to build everything from the ground up |
| 35 |
is Gentoo, with Pacemaker, GFS, and DRBD. This is for our failover system. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Kind Regards, |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Nick from Toronto. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Franklin Wang <touch21st@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
> Maybe it's intresting, although I prefer to use red hat, suse or ubuntu |
| 45 |
> in datacenter as Google. Slackware servers're not very poppular here |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> On 2014年02月20日 08:14, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
| 48 |
> |
| 49 |
> On 20 Feb 2014 05:12, "Franklin Wang" <touch21st@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 50 |
> > |
| 51 |
> > and what about slackware for server? |
| 52 |
> > |
| 53 |
> > |
| 54 |
> > -------- Original Message -------- |
| 55 |
> > Subject: |
| 56 |
> > How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? |
| 57 |
> > Date: |
| 58 |
> > Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800 |
| 59 |
> > From: |
| 60 |
> > Franklin Wang <touch21st@×××××.com> |
| 61 |
> > To: |
| 62 |
> > gentoo-server@l.g.o, gentoo-cluster@l.g.o |
| 63 |
> > |
| 64 |
> > |
| 65 |
> > Hi all, |
| 66 |
> > |
| 67 |
> > I'm not familiar with gentoo server and cluster. So could you tell me |
| 68 |
> > the experience about them? Thanks. |
| 69 |
> > |
| 70 |
> > |
| 71 |
> > |
| 72 |
> > |
| 73 |
> > Franklin Wang |
| 74 |
> > |
| 75 |
> > |
| 76 |
> > |
| 77 |
> |
| 78 |
> Gentoo makes the best server os because it's a custom built os where the |
| 79 |
> admin knows each and every aspect of the os. Security wise, there are no |
| 80 |
> unwanted or unused stuff, so lesser bugs to deal with. |
| 81 |
> |
| 82 |
> Clustering, well, you can do that using glusterfs |
| 83 |
> |
| 84 |
> |
| 85 |
> -- |
| 86 |
> skype:touch21st, Gtalk:touch21st, Yahoo/MSN:franklinwang36@×××××.com, |
| 87 |
> Xing/Linkedin:Franklin Wang |
| 88 |
> |
| 89 |
> |
Archives