1 |
Jesús Guerrero <i92guboj@×××××.es> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> El Vie, 6 de Febrero de 2009, 22:00, Harry Putnam escribió: |
4 |
>> Grant Edwards <grante@××××.com> writes: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>>> The cynic in me says that it's because Tim Berners-Lee |
8 |
>>>> invented HTML, not Richard M Stallman. |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> Info has been around a lot longer than HTML, but I think you're |
11 |
>>> largely correct. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
> [...] |
14 |
>> I recommend that people use emacs to read `info'. They work really well |
15 |
>> together and the vast arsenal of search and other tools in emacs are |
16 |
>> brought to bare in `info' reading. Once you used emacs for `info' reading |
17 |
>> the standalone `Info' reader will seem pretty primitive. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Well, I'd first need to use info to use emacs to use info, |
20 |
> you get the point :p |
21 |
|
22 |
Ahh no. You'd first need to pay attention to the thread. |
23 |
|
24 |
Then if you want to learn about emacs you might consider using emacs |
25 |
to learn about emacs rather than info. Emacs is thoroughly documented |
26 |
on board. |
27 |
|
28 |
So wrong on both counts. ; ) |
29 |
|
30 |
> A manual system should be simple enough that a newbie can |
31 |
> start to use it without knowing anything about emacs. Hell, |
32 |
> even less is a hard thing to use on man pages for a newcomer, |
33 |
> let alone emacs or vi. |
34 |
|
35 |
Your first requirement is not true of info OR THE MANUAL SYSTSEM. |
36 |
... again... pay attention. |
37 |
Newbies are saying the manual system is basically worthless to them. |
38 |
|
39 |
Far as I know... no one but newbies think the manuals are written for |
40 |
newbies. They are not. |
41 |
|
42 |
Neither is the info system. But it does have considerably more detail |
43 |
in some manuals and usually a hypertexted index and tables of |
44 |
contents. That alone (in many cases) renders it more usable. |
45 |
|
46 |
That may be why documentary books are usually not just a flat sheet 27 |
47 |
feet long with headings and text with cryptic notations.. They |
48 |
usually have some sensible format for digesting the information. Like |
49 |
indexes and tables of contents. |
50 |
|
51 |
> Once you are proficient with emacs, then info vs. man is |
52 |
> probably a non-issue for you anyway, so I don't get your |
53 |
> point there. |
54 |
|
55 |
Please... if you paid attention you'd know that the emacs thing was |
56 |
offered as an advanced method of using info. Note the keyword |
57 |
"advanced". That already precludes newbies. Further, how is that |
58 |
being proficient in emacs renders man or info a non-issue? |
59 |
|
60 |
Once more for those who are unwilling to read the thread before |
61 |
posting. |
62 |
|
63 |
The first line of inquiry is the man pages.. If that is not |
64 |
satisfactory I move to info for possibly a fuller treatment. Some |
65 |
man pages even direct the user to info for a fuller treatment. |
66 |
|
67 |
If I want to get fancy, like reading the bash documentation... I'd |
68 |
break out emacs for an easier learning experience. |
69 |
|
70 |
There should be no posts beyond this point proclaiming how tuff it is |
71 |
to use emacs if you have no network on a fresh install... Or having to |
72 |
suffer through learning info to learn emacs to.... ah but who knows. |