1 |
On 10/25/2014 12:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/25/2014 09:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: |
3 |
>> On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote: |
5 |
>>>> Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting |
6 |
>>>> from make.conf. repos.conf is the newer, more flexible way to |
7 |
>>>> configure it. |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> Unfortunately, that will break some of the third-party portage tools |
10 |
>>>> which parse make.conf directly. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>>> <Scratches head> ... so are we supposed to guess this, wait for a news article |
13 |
>>> somewhere, or will it show up in an emerge log somewhere? |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> So... would appreciate a response from someone who knows. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I really dislike making systemic changes like this without really solid |
18 |
>> guidance on how (and hopefully the why too)... |
19 |
|
20 |
> I'm only guessing, but I don't think PORTDIR is going away for a while. |
21 |
|
22 |
Ok, but that doesn't answer the main question... |
23 |
|
24 |
Mike Gilbert - apparently a gentoo dev - said that ideally we should |
25 |
remove the PORTDIR setting. |
26 |
|
27 |
This begs three questions... |
28 |
|
29 |
1. Is this correct? |
30 |
|
31 |
2. If so, is there a definitive guide/news item/post somewhere that |
32 |
explains the details (how and why mainly)? |
33 |
|
34 |
3. If not, why did Mike say this? |
35 |
|
36 |
thanks... |