Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving the portage tree to /var
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:46:33
Message-Id: 544E6895.6010207@libertytrek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving the portage tree to /var by Michael Orlitzky
1 On 10/25/2014 12:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 10/25/2014 09:57 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
3 >> On 10/7/2014 6:03 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >>> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 22:56:28 Mike Gilbert wrote:
5 >>>> Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting
6 >>>> from make.conf. repos.conf is the newer, more flexible way to
7 >>>> configure it.
8 >>>>
9 >>>> Unfortunately, that will break some of the third-party portage tools
10 >>>> which parse make.conf directly.
11 >>
12 >>> <Scratches head> ... so are we supposed to guess this, wait for a news article
13 >>> somewhere, or will it show up in an emerge log somewhere?
14 >>
15 >> So... would appreciate a response from someone who knows.
16 >>
17 >> I really dislike making systemic changes like this without really solid
18 >> guidance on how (and hopefully the why too)...
19
20 > I'm only guessing, but I don't think PORTDIR is going away for a while.
21
22 Ok, but that doesn't answer the main question...
23
24 Mike Gilbert - apparently a gentoo dev - said that ideally we should
25 remove the PORTDIR setting.
26
27 This begs three questions...
28
29 1. Is this correct?
30
31 2. If so, is there a definitive guide/news item/post somewhere that
32 explains the details (how and why mainly)?
33
34 3. If not, why did Mike say this?
35
36 thanks...

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Moving the portage tree to /var Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>