1 |
Luke Ravitch wrote: |
2 |
> On 2007-01-19 09:45, Vlad Dogaru <ddvlad@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> I am especially looking for a browser to substitute Firefox (it's great, but |
5 |
>> quite a memory hog). I like links, what with its graphical capabilities, but |
6 |
>> it lacks tabs and that's a major downside in my vision. I've tried Conkeror |
7 |
>> for Firefox, but it's too Emacs-centric (vim person here) and also disables |
8 |
>> tabs (or maybe it's me -- I couldn't get them to work). |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I'd never heard of Conkeror, so I started playing with it. I really |
12 |
> like it (but *I* am an Emacs guy). If you do "M-x use-vi-keys" (where |
13 |
> "M-x" is probably Alt-x on your machine) then it feels more vi-like |
14 |
> (j,k scroll up/down; h,l go back/forward; colon for commands instead |
15 |
> of M-x). |
16 |
> |
17 |
> It doesn't seem to do tabs, but it will open pages in different |
18 |
> (Emacs-like) buffers. Use "C-x f" (with emacs keys) to open a URL in |
19 |
> a new buffer. Then "C-x b" to switch between buffers. (Not sure what |
20 |
> the equivilent vi-style keystrokes are, but they might be there) |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Of course, Conkeror is still Firefox underneath, so that won't help |
23 |
> with it being a memory hog. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Anyway, thanks for showing me something new and cool! |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
You mean Konqueror. |
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |