1 |
Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 05:22:41 Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Hi, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Quick question about LVM. I have a 750Gb drive that has miscellaneous |
7 |
>> stuff on it. Stuff likes videos, music, pictures, ISO files and a few |
8 |
>> other things. It's not full yet but it is working on it. I have my OS |
9 |
>> on sda. The large drive is on sdc. If I buy another drive it should be |
10 |
>> sdd. I think this is possible from what I have read but want to make |
11 |
>> sure. Could I put sdc and sdd on LVM but the OS remain as it is with |
12 |
>> LVM not involved at all? Basically, my OS stays just like it is and is |
13 |
>> not touched my LVM at all but the two larger drives are managed by LVM. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> Simple (and complete answer): Yes, you can use LVM only for a subset of the |
16 |
> drives you have inside a system. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> You will need to do it in the following steps though: |
19 |
> - create PV, LVM and LV on the new drive |
20 |
> - copy data over |
21 |
> - create PV on old drive and add it to LVM |
22 |
> Contact me or list if you need help with the actual commands and syntax. |
23 |
> (There are plenty of howtos around) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
I was reading the howto on a couple sites and it sounded like this could |
28 |
be done. Glad to know I would have to copy the files over to a LVM |
29 |
drive tho. That info was something I didn't know. I was hoping for |
30 |
some magic. lol |
31 |
|
32 |
>> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS |
33 |
>> on. Just my personal opinion on LVM. |
34 |
>> |
35 |
> Interesting argument. You don't trust LVM, so you put your personal files on |
36 |
> there, but not the easily replacable stuff like OS? :) |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
I like my OS setup and don't want to have to reinstall. Although Gentoo |
41 |
has never let me down yet, I don't want to add to the confusion. If I |
42 |
can boot and get to my email, I can get help to fix LVM if needed. I |
43 |
also keep a backup of my personal files. I could recover the things I |
44 |
don't backup tho. Most of my concern is my lack of experience with |
45 |
LVM. If I was a guru on it, I might feel better about it. |
46 |
|
47 |
>> If there is a better solution to link two large drives, I'm open to |
48 |
>> those ideas as well. LVM is all I can think of is why I mention it. |
49 |
>> |
50 |
> RAID-0 (if they're same size) or linking them together. |
51 |
> Compared to those, I would always recommend LVM as that is easier to maintain |
52 |
> then JBOD or RAID-0. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> There might also be filesystems that include disk-spanning, but if you're |
55 |
> already not convinced about LVM being reliable, I wouldn't use one of these |
56 |
> filesystems then. |
57 |
> |
58 |
> Please note, I have not lost data related to issues with LVM. I have, in the |
59 |
> distant past, lost data related to issues with filesystems. |
60 |
> Because of the latter, I rely on a combination of RAID-subsystems with LVM on |
61 |
> top and reliable backups :) |
62 |
> |
63 |
> -- |
64 |
> Joost Roeleveld |
65 |
> |
66 |
> |
67 |
|
68 |
Unless someone has a better idea, I think LVM is about all I can find |
69 |
that would do this. The drives won't be even close to each other. I |
70 |
hope I can find a nice 2Tb drive that I can afford. ;-) Maybe that |
71 |
will last a while. The 750Gb drive did last a pretty good while. I'm |
72 |
not sure after that tho. |
73 |
|
74 |
Thanks for the info. It did add to my knowledge and settle one of my |
75 |
questions. |
76 |
|
77 |
Dale |
78 |
|
79 |
:-) :-) |