Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Absymal IDE performance with gentoo-sources-2.6.22 and why hda instead of sda?
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:00:28
Message-Id: 13462767.Vc6QEx9Tan@m-id.message-center.info
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Absymal IDE performance with gentoo-sources-2.6.22 and why hda instead of sda? by Dan Farrell
1 · Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx>:
2
3 > Have you considered trying with those ata kernel params turned off?
4
5 No, I haven't. But I'll consider this first thing tomorrow morning.
6 Nothing bad can happen - besides an unbootable system ;) And that's
7 "fine".
8
9 Thanks for this idea!
10
11 > You seem to know what you're doing,
12
13 Thx.
14
15 > but I use no such parameters and
16 > haven't any problems.
17
18 I think I was unable to boot without them in pre 2.6.21 times. But
19 maybe this has changed. I'll find out.
20
21 Thanks again,
22
23 Alexander Skwar
24 --
25 I don't have any use for bodyguards, but I do have a specific use for two
26 highly trained certified public accountants.
27 -- Elvis Presley
28
29 --
30 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies