1 |
On 2013-08-19 04:55, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Probably for exactly the same reason you or anyone else uses Gentoo; |
4 |
> USE flags, portage, you can customize at your hearts content... |
5 |
|
6 |
USE flags, in my mind, are there for minimising dependencies so that I |
7 |
don't need to install all the crap that binary distros install. That is |
8 |
why I use Gentoo, in order to avoid all the crap that things like Gnome |
9 |
wants to install (for instance, I have -gnome, -dbus, -gconf in my |
10 |
make.conf in order to avoid a heart attack[1]). Customisation are only |
11 |
possible if you allow to minimise dependencies; and it's also dependent |
12 |
on a flexible base system (if you put restrictions on it, say, if /usr |
13 |
can be separate or not[without an initrd], then flexibility decreases). |
14 |
|
15 |
> I've never used Fedora. I used RedHay back in the day of RedHat 4.2 |
16 |
> (it was my very first use of Linux in 1996), then moved to Mandrake |
17 |
> (remember Mandrake?), then Gentoo in 2003. I haven't used any other |
18 |
> distro since then. |
19 |
|
20 |
This is rather pointless, but I started using a Linux based OS (don't |
21 |
remember the name, but it came on 9 floppy disks with kernel 0.93) on my |
22 |
Amiga 4000 in the early nineties. I've used Redhat, Mandrake, Debian, |
23 |
Slackware and others, landing with LFS in 2000 which I was happy with |
24 |
but it was too much work so I settled with Gentoo in the early 2000 |
25 |
which is the best compromise I have found. Haven't used any other |
26 |
"distro" since then either... |
27 |
|
28 |
> I want Gentoo to keep being the best possible Linux (I *really* don't |
29 |
> care if it works in *BSD, Solaris, or Windows). Believe it or not, I'm |
30 |
|
31 |
I want Gentoo to be the best *OS* for me. To me that is achieved by |
32 |
having the widest possible selection of applications and following |
33 |
standards as closely as possible (POSIX, FHS). I don't really care if |
34 |
it's Linux or not but I'm most comfortable in a UNIX like environment. |
35 |
That said, I think what you are advocating is going in a opposite |
36 |
direction to what I want... to me the changes you seek are making Gentoo |
37 |
going from best to bad; reducing choice/flexibility. |
38 |
|
39 |
> pretty sure that for Gentoo to keep being the best possible Linux, it |
40 |
> has to use systemd. |
41 |
|
42 |
I fully believe you think that systemd is the best choice for init |
43 |
systems out there, but then again you are a Gnome user (as I understand |
44 |
it) and to me that is quite the opposite from what I want (I abhor the |
45 |
whole Gnome eco system and Lennart is an old Gnome dev so I can see |
46 |
where the influences comes from). I happen to think that many small |
47 |
tools with clearly defined interfaces (i.e. a standard) works so much |
48 |
better and are so much more flexible than "... the one system to rule |
49 |
them all...". |
50 |
|
51 |
> You don't have to agree with that, of course. But please understand |
52 |
> that I only support systemd in Gentoo, because I love Gentoo. |
53 |
|
54 |
I understand that. The thing is, as I see it, you "support" (advocate |
55 |
would perhaps be a better choice of words) systemd and _only_ systemd, |
56 |
thereby "forcing it down our throats". |
57 |
|
58 |
> And, putting aside systemd and getting back on topic to the council's |
59 |
> decision of (eventually) not supporting separated /usr without an |
60 |
> initramfs; have you ever stopped to consider that, perhaps, that's the |
61 |
> best *technical* decision? (*gasp*) |
62 |
|
63 |
I fail to see why I should waste time and resources by having a |
64 |
duplicate set of tools (one in the initramfs and one in /). How is that |
65 |
a *technical* solution? I would call it bandaid. There is no difference |
66 |
from having static binaries in / (it's just a matter of locality). So, |
67 |
yes, I have thought about it and I don't consider it the best *decision* |
68 |
(*gasp*). |
69 |
|
70 |
> When you have almost all distributions converging on that, and even |
71 |
|
72 |
You said "... customize at your hearts content...". To me that assumes |
73 |
flexibility. If you take away choice, you take away flexibility. To me |
74 |
that's a contradiction. That "almost all distributions" are converging |
75 |
is a non-argument; it says nothing about "technical" excellence |
76 |
(whatever that means). It may merely mean that the devs in said distros |
77 |
have given up and just "eat" whatever crap they're served because of |
78 |
lack of manpower or whatever. |
79 |
|
80 |
[1] Yes, I hate Gnome with a passion ever since using it on those |
81 |
distros mentioned above. |
82 |
|
83 |
Best regards |
84 |
|
85 |
Peter K |