1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 04:07:50 -0600, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>>> Yes, because the files are stored in an archive file, not directly on |
6 |
>>> the CD. dar can split the archives into CD (or DVD) sized chunks and |
7 |
>>> kdar can (AFAIR) write them to disc. dar also creates an index of |
8 |
>>> what's in which file and writes this to the first and last backup |
9 |
>>> files. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
>> May need a little more info on this archive part. If I use this to back |
14 |
>> up my whole system and then lets say the hard drive fails completely. I |
15 |
>> can just untar or unzip to restore the system right? I have some data |
16 |
>> to back up but I may use this to do a system back-up too. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> dar uses its own archive format, so you'll need a live disc with the dar |
20 |
> executable to unpack them. I think there's a statically compiled version |
21 |
> of dar available that you can chuck on your backup discs. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
Hmmm, does the Gentoo CD have this? |
25 |
> |
26 |
>> While I am at it, if I do a system back up, do I need to worry about |
27 |
>> backing up /proc and /sys? From my understanding the kernel generates |
28 |
>> these when it boots up. Just curious about what I really need to back |
29 |
>> up. Oh, what about /dev too. I use udev and have the tarball set to |
30 |
>> no. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> All three are virtual filesystems, so you should not attempt to back them |
34 |
> up. I prefer to use the --one-filesystem option when backing up with tar, |
35 |
> dar has a similar option AFAIR. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
OK, so skip /proc, /sys and /dev then? I need to do some reading I |
41 |
guess, if it ever gets it downloaded that is. This slow dial-up sucks. :-( |
42 |
|
43 |
Thanks for the info. One of these days I'll actually know something. LOL |
44 |
|
45 |
Dale |
46 |
|
47 |
:-) :-) :-) |