1 |
KH schrieb: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> after reading some emails from the list I have been trying to unmerge |
5 |
> cdrkit and to emerge cdrtools. I aslo hat to unmerge dvd+rw-tools and |
6 |
> kino. Anyway I am still not able to emerge cdrtools. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> !!! Cannot write to '/usr/include/scsilib/scg'. |
9 |
> !!! Please check permissions and directories for broken symlinks. |
10 |
> !!! You may start the merge process again by using ebuild: |
11 |
> !!! ebuild /usr/portage/app-cdr/cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01_alpha34.ebuild |
12 |
> merge |
13 |
> !!! And finish by running this: env-update |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> than there is a very long list I can post if needed. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> ls -lah /usr/include/scsilib/scg |
19 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Jun 25 12:48 /usr/include/scsilib/scg -> |
20 |
> /usr/include/scsilib/usal |
21 |
> |
22 |
> on my xterm there is red highlighting under the output. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> What can I do to install cdrtools correctly to a working standard? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Will I be able to emerge kino again, without cdrkit? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Thanks for any help |
30 |
> |
31 |
> kh |
32 |
|
33 |
So you successfully unmerged cdrkit, dvd+rw-tools and kino. The |
34 |
installation of cdrtools fails because of a broken symlink. I guess the |
35 |
/usr/include/scsilib/scg symlink to usr/include/scsilib/usal has not |
36 |
been removed with cdrkit and is now broken and the cdrtools installation |
37 |
can not overwrite the link. If the output is really red it is indeed a |
38 |
broken symlink and you can safely remove it, then try to install |
39 |
cdrtools again or use the proposed commands. |
40 |
|
41 |
It should be no problem to install kino again as cdrkit provides the |
42 |
same functionality like cdrtools, besides the different amount of |
43 |
development that happens on both projects. But i think there was no need |
44 |
to remove kino at all when switching to cdrtools, because it has no |
45 |
dependency on both apps. |
46 |
|
47 |
I find it a bit sad that cdrkit is the preferred cd burning application |
48 |
because it satisfies the cdrtools virtual first. This means when you |
49 |
have neither cdrkit nor cdrtools installed cdrkit is preferred. However |
50 |
i could not find out why. There is nothing in the profiles which defines |
51 |
how cdrkit is favored. Maybe someone can point me to the right location. |
52 |
|
53 |
I think cdrtools should be preferred and not the fork cdrkit! |
54 |
|
55 |
My make profile points to |
56 |
/media/system/repositories/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0. |
57 |
|
58 |
Regards, |
59 |
|
60 |
Daniel |
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
|
64 |
-- |
65 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |