1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
if you are not afraid of the command line I would recommend KVM. I use |
4 |
it for my virtualization needs. When you don't want the sdl window you |
5 |
may use the -vnc switch. -daemonize switch is great for running in the |
6 |
backgroud. the -balloon switch is great for memory savings, I |
7 |
recommend KSM in your kernel also. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
Petri Rosenström |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Bill Longman <bill.longman@×××××.com> wrote: |
15 |
> On 08/27/2010 12:58 AM, Konstantinos Agouros wrote: |
16 |
>> Hi, |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> I am currently running a guest with VMware-Server-1. However the modules |
19 |
>> needed for that on the host are no longer supported and I am stuck with 2.6.31 |
20 |
>> for the moment. |
21 |
>> So I am thinking of alternatives. My requirements: |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> It should only need as much RAM on the host as needed (so XEN with static |
24 |
>> assignment is out) |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> It should run headless (I don't want a window on the desktop but be able |
27 |
>> get console access when needed). |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> VMWare import/compatibility would be nice but is not a must have. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> I use VirtualBox on a Mac but can it run headless? Any other proposals? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> VBox runs great headless. I start three VMs at boot time, all over VRDP. |
34 |
> Highly recommended. You can migrate it to other systems if you want, too. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |